Habermas’s Public Sphere: A Critique

Hofmann’s book is a historically minded, revisionist, critical companion to Habermas’s Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Assuming potential readers already know and teach the book, Hofmann spends the bulk of his energies on the historical record, e.g., the debates in English Parliament or trade in the 17th-century Dutch Republic. Does Habermas’s “model case of 19th-century England fit the bill for a genuine public sphere? (No.) Hofmann also engages with an array of Habermas’s influences, among them Schiller, Say, Rousseau, Marx, and Kant. Hofmann corrects and sometimes scolds Habermas for errors of omission and commission, for misunderstanding or ignoring important historical or intellectual sources, and for inconsistently disowning and yet appropriating what Hofmann calls the “stylized account of the rise of intimacy, the Enlightenment, and the modern state in Reinhart Koselleck via his teacher, Carl Schmitt. Though in a later essay, Habermas acknowledges the early pluralization of public spheres, Hofmann usefully goes some way toward showing just what such an account might look like. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students through faculty.

— CHOICE